<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Retiree health: CalPERS gets rival for $59 billion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://calpensions.com/2009/11/02/retiree-health-calpers-gets-rival-for-59-billion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://calpensions.com/2009/11/02/retiree-health-calpers-gets-rival-for-59-billion/</link>
	<description>CalPERS, CalSTRS and other government pensions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 10:27:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Mark H. Shapiro</title>
		<link>http://calpensions.com/2009/11/02/retiree-health-calpers-gets-rival-for-59-billion/#comment-3117</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Mark H. Shapiro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpensions.com/?p=2023#comment-3117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder if Calpensions, which spends considerable time posting negative reports about public sector pensions will bother to cover the following story

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125719963066023835.html#mod=todays_us_money_and_investing

which shows that private sector pensions for those at the top -- the wealthy and well-connected -- are getting more lucrative by the day, while pensions for average working stiffs in the private sector are all but gone, and pensions for public sector working stiffs are being attacked from all sides.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if Calpensions, which spends considerable time posting negative reports about public sector pensions will bother to cover the following story</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125719963066023835.html#mod=todays_us_money_and_investing" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125719963066023835.html#mod=todays_us_money_and_investing</a></p>
<p>which shows that private sector pensions for those at the top &#8212; the wealthy and well-connected &#8212; are getting more lucrative by the day, while pensions for average working stiffs in the private sector are all but gone, and pensions for public sector working stiffs are being attacked from all sides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

