<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Battle over costly pension rule proposal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://calpensions.com/2009/10/30/battle-over-costly-pension-rule-proposal-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://calpensions.com/2009/10/30/battle-over-costly-pension-rule-proposal-3/</link>
	<description>CalPERS, CalSTRS and other government pensions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 10:27:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://calpensions.com/2009/10/30/battle-over-costly-pension-rule-proposal-3/#comment-3081</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpensions.com/?p=2012#comment-3081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regardless of whether a &quot;risk-free&quot; calculation is used, lowering the projected returns makes sense. If lowered projections underestimate the actual returns that are realized, that seems like less of a problem than the other way around.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless of whether a &#8220;risk-free&#8221; calculation is used, lowering the projected returns makes sense. If lowered projections underestimate the actual returns that are realized, that seems like less of a problem than the other way around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

